Program Pelatihan Servis Laptop – Praktis dan Siap Kerja

Bullying at Abu Hurairah (Mataram): Facts, ISO 9001:2015 Evaluation, and Failure Analysis

Last updated: 25 August 2025 (Asia/Jakarta)

Executive Summary

A serious bullying-related incident reportedly occurred at Abu Hurairah Islamic Boarding School (Mataram) in late 2022, leaving a student traumatised. Subsequent measures (allowing the student to commute; counselling) were insufficient to restore safety and trust. In 2025 the school promoted ISO 9001:2015 and ran staff trainings; the city religious office formed an anti-bullying task force. Positive steps—yet largely reactive. This post aligns remedies with ISO 9001:2015 so the system becomes preventive, auditable, and culture-deep.

1) Verified Facts (What Happened) & Immediate Remedies

• Incident & timeline: Local media reported an “extraordinary” school-linked incident in late 2022; the student fled in 2024 due to trauma.
• Initial response: School allowed non-boarding and promised psychological support; impact persisted.
• Wider response: 2025 saw an anti-bullying task force (city level) and internal staff training at the school.

Immediate, victim-centred remedies:

• Independent counselling and a safety plan; no forced return to the same boarding environment.
• Interim dorm controls: added supervision, anonymous reporting, safe spaces, night-duty rotation.
• Documented case handling using a CAPA flow (containment → root cause → corrective → preventive → effectiveness check).

2) ISO 9001:2015 — What It Requires (In Education Context)

• Risk-based thinking: Identify and control safeguarding risks before harm.
• Leadership & commitment (Clause 5.1): Top management owns results; safety is part of the Quality Policy and objectives.
• Customer focus: Students/parents are the “customers”; safety and dignity are core needs.
• Performance evaluation & improvement: Reporting, internal audit, management review, and continual improvement with evidence.

3) Gap Snapshot — ISO Intent vs On-the-Ground Reality

ISO 9001:2015 Expectation	Observed Reality at Abu Hurairah
Proactive, risk-based safeguarding in boarding life.	Severe harm occurred (2022) → controls were reactive, not anticipatory.
Leadership ensures QMS achieves safety objectives.	Internal resolution incomplete; leadership posture improved only from 2025 onward.
Customer focus: safety & trust of students/parents.	Trust damaged; safety needs unmet for at least one case.
Continual improvement via data, audit, review, CAPA.	Trainings/ISO push in 2025; needs measurable, sustained results (KPIs closed in reviews).

4) Failure Analysis — Where the System Broke

1. Design: Safeguarding not treated as a top-tier operational risk in the original QMS design (dorm scenarios, hazing, CCTV uptime, escalation paths).
2. Implementation: Policies lacked “muscle” at the frontline (housemasters, student leaders, night duty). Competence/awareness/resources lagged.
3. Oversight: Weak internal detection and follow-through; issues escalated externally instead of being closed through internal audit and management review.

5) Solutions — ISO-Aligned, Actionable, Measurable

5.1 Risk-Based Safeguarding Controls (Make Prevention Visible)

• Risk register for residential life: scenarios, likelihood/impact, controls, owners, review cadence.
• Dorm supervision redesign: adult-to-student ratios, patrol routes, blind-spot mapping, CCTV health monitoring (recording alerts, disk SMART checks).
• Anonymous reporting (QR form + hotline) with whistleblower protection; posters in every dorm corridor.
• Immediate triage SOP: separate parties; independent safeguarding lead; evidence preservation; parental notice; timed actions.

5.2 Leadership Mechanisms (Clause 5.1 Done Properly)

• Quarterly Management Review on Safeguarding with KPIs: incidents/1,000 students; time-to-response; time-to-closure; repeat-offense rate.
• Quality Policy & Objectives include “Zero Bullying” targets; link senior allowances/bonuses to safety KPIs.
• Leadership walk-throughs: scheduled and unannounced dorm visits by top leadership.

5.3 People & Culture (Make It Lived, Not Posted)

• Mandatory training each term for housemasters and student leaders; competence records in the QMS.
• Student induction every term: rights, reporting how-to, peer support network.
• Parent communication: monthly safeguarding bulletin (privacy-respecting) to rebuild trust.

5.4 Assurance & Continual Improvement

• Internal safeguarding audits each term (rotate auditors, include dorm night checks).
• CAPA discipline: 5-Whys/root cause; effectiveness verification at +60/+120 days.
• External linkage: share quarterly summaries with the city anti-bullying task force; invite spot checks.

5.5 Make the ISO Claim Real (Not Cosmetic)

• Publish a Safeguarding Annex to the QMS (process maps, roles, forms, SLAs).
• Add leading indicators (e.g., % students who know how to report; “mystery-report” pass rate) beside lagging indicators.
• Record and review Management-Review minutes on safeguarding until indicators stabilise.

Note on Sources

This synthesis draws on local media coverage (June 2024) of the student’s trauma case, public posts from the school regarding staff training and ISO activities (2025), and city religious-affairs statements on an anti-bullying task force (Aug 2025). Details are kept general to respect privacy while enabling systemic correction.